“The Ministry of Injustice and CI5 are used to detect, determine, prevent and take suitable action or actions against those transgressors against the law outside the norm of criminal activity. To contain and render ineffective such by whatever means necessary. That’s our official brief, by any means necessary.”
‘I am also very disappointed in those who have let you down and I have asked for that/them to be addressed’ – Jo Shiner Chief Constable Sussex Police EA579. Sussex Police, the King and High Sheriff
Should a Legal 500 barrister that commits fraud be prosecuted and disbarred ?
Would this criminality and dishonesty diminish the trust and confidence which the public places in the profession?
Annabel Charlotte Darlow KC, born on the 19th March 1970, is a highly respected figure in the British legal system, known for her exceptional advocacy, […]
A serious IT glitch in the HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) system in England and Wales has sparked allegations of a cover-up, raising concerns […]
A chief officer of police may, at the request of any individual or entity, provide special police services at specific premises or within any locality […]
The National Police Coordination Centre (NPoCC) is a UK national unit that supports police forces across the United Kingdom, Crown Dependencies, and British Overseas Territories […]
Brighton Pride, officially Brighton & Hove Pride, is often cited as the UK’s largest and most popular Pride festival, drawing significant crowds and generating substantial […]
The judgment by Mr Justice Linden in Smith v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [2025] EWHC 1805 (Admin) ruled that Northumbria Police breached their duty […]
The Police Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Legitimacy (PEEL) assessment for Sussex Police, conducted by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) for […]
The binary phrase “black and white” suggests clarity, simplicity, and unambiguous boundaries. When applied to the law, it implies a system where rules are clear-cut, […]
A High Court ruling by Mr Justice Linden KC has determined that Northumbria Police breached their duty of impartiality by allowing uniformed officers to march […]
A contra mundum (against everyone in the world) privacy injunction was granted to the Ministry of Defence on 1st September 2023 at the High Court by […]
The implied right of access refers to a presumed permission for individuals or entities to enter private property for specific purposes, even without formal consent. […]
In England and Wales, the legal system demands integrity and truth from all legal professionals involved in court proceedings. Solicitors and barristers are bound by […]
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of […]
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in […]
The performance by Bob Vylan at Glastonbury 2025, where frontman Bobby Vylan (reportedly Pascal Robinson-Foster) led chants of “death, death to the IDF” and “from […]
In England and Wales, social media is generally defined as online platforms that enable users to create, share, and interact with content and each other. This includes a wide range of platforms such as Facebook, X, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, and others. Social media allows for the exchange of information, opinions, and multimedia content like videos, images, and text.
Section 4a of The Limitation Act 1980 defines the time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood as one year from the date on which the cause of action accrued.
Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 gives the right to freedom of expression. “This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.”
“Harassment is generally understood to involve improper oppressive and unreasonable conduct that is targeted at an individual and calculated to produce alarm and distress” – Para 38 R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92, [2016]